Examples of Cheating:

1. Fraudulent Inducement in Goods Transaction:

• Definition: Inducing a person to deliver or refrain from delivering goods, knowing that such action may cause harm to the deceived party.
• Example: Requesting a shopkeeper to deliver goods but intentionally refusing to pay for them.

2. Impersonation for Illicit Gain:

• Definition: Committing a fraudulent act while acting dishonestly and pretending to be someone else, often for personal gain.
• Example: Personating as a police officer to obtain information not accessible to the general public.

3. Breach of Fiduciary Duty Leading to Harm:

• Definition: When a person, in a fiduciary relationship, knowingly neglects the victim’s interests, causing harm to the victim.
• Example: A doctor failing to provide the correct treatment, knowingly putting the patient’s well-being at risk.

4. False Promise or Misrepresentation for Gain:

• Definition: Making a false promise or deceiving another person through false representation for personal benefit.
• Example: Falsely promising marriage to someone with the intention of obtaining property or other advantages.

These examples illustrate different forms of cheating, encompassing deceptive practices that exploit trust, misrepresentations, and actions that knowingly lead to harm or loss for personal gain. Cheating involves a breach of trust and an intention to gain an unfair advantage through dishonest means.

Recent Supreme Court Judgments on Section 420, IPC:

1. Syed Yaseer Ibrahim v. State of U.P.:

• Background: The appellant faced charges under IPC Section 420 related to fraudulent property claims. The High Court initially rejected the appellant’s plea to dismiss the FIR, but the Supreme Court overturned this decision in 2021, emphasizing the lack of crucial evidence in the Section 420 accusation.

2. Archana Rana v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.:

• Background: The appellant was accused of cheating (IPC Section 420) in an FIR where a promised job did not materialize, leading to physical assault allegations. The Supreme Court, in its judgment, underscored the importance of deceit and fraudulent inducement in IPC Section 420, resulting in the dismissal of charges under Sections 419 and 420.

3. Ram Narain Popli v. CBI:

• Background: A three-judge bench examined the elements required to prove cheating under Section 420. The court emphasized the need to establish deception, inducement, and fraudulent intent beyond a reasonable doubt to establish the offence of cheating.

4. Abhayanand Mishra v. State of Bihar:

• Background: The accused was charged with attempting to cheat by falsely claiming to be a graduate and a teacher in a university application. The Supreme Court held that making false statements to deceive the university constituted an attempt to cheat under Section 420, IPC.

5. Bakshish Singh Dhaliwal v. State of Punjab:

• Background: The appellant submitted false claims to the Government of Burma, leading to charges under Section 420. The Supreme Court held the appellant guilty, emphasizing that the false claims indicated knowledge of their falsehood, satisfying the requirements of Section 420.

6. Mahadeo Prasad v. State of West Bengal:

• Background: The judgment clarified that for the offence of cheating, the intention to deceive must exist at the time of inducement. Mere failure to fulfill promises doesn’t necessarily amount to cheating.

7. Hari Prasad Chamaria v. Bishun Kumar Surekha and others:

• Background: The judgment highlighted that an offence under Section 420 requires a demonstration of dishonest or fraudulent intentions at the time of parting with money. Failure to fulfill contractual obligations alone may not constitute cheating.

These recent Supreme Court judgments provide insights into the interpretation and application of Section 420, IPC, emphasizing the need for fraudulent intent, deception, and inducement in establishing the offence of cheating.

Cyber Fraud and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC):

In the realm of cyber fraud in India, Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) plays a crucial role in addressing deceptive practices facilitated through technology. This legal provision specifically deals with situations where individuals employ digital means to deceive others, leading them to part with their property or undertake actions they would not have otherwise taken, resulting in a loss.

Legal Implications: If an individual is found guilty under Section 420, they may face imprisonment for up to seven years, coupled with the possibility of being fined. This legal framework is essential for safeguarding individuals from exploitation in the digital space.

Forms of Cyber Cheating:

1. Online Scams:

• Definition: Deceptive practices on the internet where individuals trick others into making payments or divulging personal information, such as bank account details.
• Example: Fraudsters using various online platforms to deceive individuals into transferring money under false pretenses.

2. Phishing:

• Definition: Sending fraudulent emails or messages that mimic authenticity, often accompanied by the creation of fake websites. The goal is to trick individuals into unknowingly revealing sensitive information like passwords.
• Example: Cybercriminals posing as legitimate entities through email communications to extract confidential login credentials.

3. Shopping Fraud:

• Definition: Unscrupulous online sellers making commitments regarding products they intend to sell but failing to deliver after receiving payment.
• Example: Fraudulent e-commerce vendors promising the sale of goods but not fulfilling the orders after receiving payment.

4. Ponzi Schemes:

• Definition: Fraudulent investment schemes where individuals promise substantial returns, using funds from new investors to settle debts owed to previous investors. Often, there is no genuine investment activity.
• Example: Individuals enticing investors with promises of high returns while operating a scheme that lacks meaningful investment.

The multifaceted nature of cyber cheating underscores the importance of legal measures like Section 420 in deterring and penalizing deceptive practices in the digital realm, thereby protecting individuals from financial harm and exploitation.

Appeal Procedure Under Section 420, IPC:

In the context of Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the procedure for appeal adheres to fundamental principles outlined in the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). It’s essential to understand the key principles governing appeals in criminal cases:

1. Statutory Creation of Appeal:

• An appeal is a creation of statute, implying that the right to appeal is not inherent but is established by specific legal provisions.

2. No Inherent Right to Appeal:

• There is no inherent right to file an appeal. The right to appeal is conferred by the law and is subject to statutory limitations.

3. Appeal Not Limited to Conviction:

• An appeal is not limited only to cases of conviction. It may also be filed in matters related to acquittal or other judicial orders.

4. Exclusion of Petty Cases:

• Generally, there is no appeal in petty cases. The nature and seriousness of the offense may influence the appealability of a case.

5. No Appeal on Guilty Plea:

• In cases where the accused pleads guilty, there is generally no appeal against the conviction. The plea of guilt often limits the grounds for appeal.

6. Victim’s Right to Appeal:

• Section 372, CrPC grants the victim the right to appeal under special circumstances, such as a judgment of acquittal, conviction for a lesser offense, or inadequate compensation.

Unified Appeal Procedures:

• The procedure for appeals in the Courts of Session and High Courts generally follows the same set of rules. The High Court, being the highest court of appeal in a state, has broader powers in cases where an appeal is allowed.
• The Supreme Court, as the highest court of appeal in the country, holds wide discretionary and plenary powers in appeal cases. Its jurisdiction is governed by CrPC, the Indian Constitution, and the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970.

Rights of the Accused to Appeal:

• The accused has the right to appeal to the Supreme Court against a High Court judgment that reversed an order of acquittal and sentenced the accused to life imprisonment, ten years or more, or death.
• If multiple persons are convicted in a trial, one or all accused persons have the right to appeal if a collective order has been passed by the court.

Exceptions to Appeal:

• Certain circumstances, as outlined in Section 265G, Section 375, and Section 376 of the CrPC, may restrict the right to appeal.

In summary, the appeal procedure under Section 420, IPC, follows established legal principles, ensuring that the right to appeal is exercised within statutory frameworks and subject to specific conditions.

Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) outlines the procedure for recording information in cognizable cases. Here is a revised presentation:

Section 154: Recording of Information in Cognizable Cases

(1) Recording of Information:

• In cases of cognizable offenses, any information given orally to the officer in charge of a police station must be reduced to writing by the officer or under his direction.
• The written information, whether provided in writing initially or recorded subsequently, should be read over to the informant.
• The person providing the information is required to sign it.
• The substance of the information is to be entered in a book maintained by the officer, in a form prescribed by the State Government.

(2) Providing Copy to Informant:

• A free-of-cost copy of the recorded information shall be given forthwith to the informant.

(3) Redress for Refusal to Record Information:

• If an officer in charge of a police station refuses to record the information as per subsection (1), any aggrieved person has the right to send the substance of such information in writing and by post to the Superintendent of Police concerned.
• Upon receiving such information, if the Superintendent of Police is satisfied that it discloses the commission of a cognizable offense, he shall either conduct the investigation personally or direct a subordinate police officer to investigate.
• The investigation shall be carried out in accordance with the procedures specified in the Code, and the designated officer shall possess all the powers of an officer in charge of a police station concerning that particular offense.

FAQs on Section 420 of IPC:

1. What offence is defined under IPC 420?

Answer: IPC 420 defines the offence of cheating and thereby dishonestly inducing the delivery of property, or making, altering, or destroying a valuable security.

2. What is the punishment for IPC 420 Case?

Answer: The punishment for an IPC 420 case is imprisonment for up to 7 years, along with a fine.

3. Is IPC 420 a cognizable offence or non-cognizable offence?

Answer: IPC 420 is a cognizable offence.

4. How to file/defend your case for IPC 420 offence?

Answer: Use LawRato to file or defend your case under IPC 420 with the assistance of the best criminal lawyers near you.

5. Is IPC 420 a bailable or non-bailable offence?

Answer: IPC 420 is a non-bailable offence.

6. In what court can IPC 420 be tried?

Answer: IPC 420 is tried in the court of Magistrate First Class.

And Also Read Bail Application Format Under Section 437

Also Read Nothing Chats App